102 Min. | Drama – Romance – War | December 1942
IMDB Rating: 8.6
Director: Michael Curtiz
Staring: Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, Paul Henreid
Casablanca Review: “Casablanca” remains Hollywood’s finest moment, a film that succeeds on such a vast scale not because of anything experimental or deliberately earthshaking in its design, but for the way it cohered to and reaffirmed the movie-making conventions of its day. Casablanca is the film that played by the rules while elevating the form, and remains the touchstone for those who talk about Hollywood’s greatness. It’s the first week in December, 1941, and in the Vichy-controlled African port city of Casablanca, American ex-pat Rick Blaine runs a gin joint he calls “Rick’s Cafe Americaine.” Everybody comes to Rick’s, including thieves, spies, Nazis, partisans, and refugees trying to make their way to Lisbon and, eventually, America. Rick is a tough, sour kind of guy, but he’s still taken for a loop when fate hands him two sudden twists: A pair of unchallengeable exit visas, and a woman named Ilsa who left him broken-hearted in Paris and now needs him to help her and her resistance-leader husband escape.
Humphrey Bogart is Rick and Ingrid Bergman is Ilsa, in roles that are archetypes in film lore. They are great parts besides, very multilayered and resistant to stereotype, and both actors give career performances in what were great careers. He’s mad at her for walking out on him, while she wants him to understand her cause, but there’s a lot going on underneath with both, and it all spills out in a scene in Rick’s apartment that is one of many legendary moments. “Casablanca” is a great romance, not only for being so supremely entertaining with its humor and realistic-though-exotic wartime excitement, but because it’s not the least bit mushy. Take the way Rick’s face literally breaks when he first sees Ilsa in his bar, or how he recalls the last time he saw her in Paris: “The Germans wore gray, you wore blue.” There’s a real human dimension to these people that makes us care for them and relate to them in a way that belies the passage of years.
It’s not fashionable to discuss movie directors after Chaplin and before Welles, but surely something should be said about Michael Curtiz, who not only directed this film but other great features like “Captain Blood” and “Angels With Dirty Faces.” For my money, his “Adventures Of Robin Hood” was every bit “Casablanca’s” equal, and he even found time the same year he made “Casablanca” to make “Yankee Doodle Dandy.” When you watch a film like this, you aren’t so much aware of the director, but that’s really a testament to Curtiz’s artistry. “Casablanca” is not only exceptionally well-paced but incredibly well-shot, every frame feeling well-thought-out and legendary without distracting from the overall story. Curtiz was a product of the studio system, not a maverick like Welles or Chaplin, but he found greatness just as often, and “Casablanca,” also a product of the studio system, is the best example. It’s a film that reminds us why we go back to Hollywood again and again when we want to refresh our imaginations, and why we call it “the dream factory.”